| Neighborhood Schools |
|
School siting decisions impact growth patterns, transportation,
public health, natural resources protection, and historic
preservation, as well as the quality of education. Our
Neighborhood
Schools page contains links to articles that
offer a sampling of the recent research available on the
drawbacks of current school siting and cosntruction trends
as well as the benefits of smaller, walkable neighborhood
schools.
|
|
| |
|
| Athens-Clarke
County Transferable Development Rights Feasibility Study |
Economics, law, housing and ecology faculty members
of Alliance for Quality Growth researched the feasibility
of a Transferable Development Rights (TDR) program for Athens-Clarke
County in 2004. Under a TDR program development rights are
transferred from "sending areas," which are designated
for protection, to "receiving areas," which are
designated for growth. Conservation easements permanently
protect land in the sending areas from which the development
rights have been sold. The study offers information to the
county on what types of land might be protected, how the
TDR market would work, and the legal requirements and economic
implications of a program. If Athens-Clarke creates a TDR
program, it could be the second-ever TDR program in Georgia,
and could protect agricultural land, environmentally sensitive
areas, and/or historic and cultural resources.
|
The
Feasibility of a Transferable Development Rights Program for
Athens-Clarke County, GA (pdf) |
| |
|
| Revitalizing
Columbus South |
|
The Columbus South Revitalization 2003 summer studio
investigated solutions to revitalize Columbus South -
an older, inner city, urban part of a growing Georgia
community. Ultimately, the summer studio provided design
and graphic support for the Carl Vinson Institute's year-long
planning process. This project gave graphic representation
to reinforce locally developed planning concepts.
Studio participants researched the history, settlement
patterns, land use patterns, demographic diversity, opportunities
and constraints of the project area. At the end of the
studio process, UGA's Center for Community Design and
Preservation stepped in to compile all the infor-mation
produced during the summer and produce this report.
|
Revitalizing
Columbus South (pdf) |
| |
|
| Georgia
Greenspace Program |
|
Several Alliance for Quality Growth members helped
develop and implement Governor Barnes' greenspace protection
initiative. Forty counties are eligible to participate in
the program, which gives counties financial encouragement
to protect at least 20% of their total lands from development.
Our faculty staffed the committee that drafted the program
in 1999. We continue to work with counties to draft the
community greenspace protection plans required for participation
in the program. We also created a toolkit to help counties
identify and prioritize lands that should be protected under
the program.
|
Georgia
Community
Greenspace Program
(external site)
Report
of the Community Green Space Advisory Committee
Jackson
County
Greenspace Plan
Greenspace
Site Selection Toolkit
Greenspace
Site
Selection Toolkit
calculations
(hold down Shift key
and click to download)
|
| |
|
Cost of Community
Services and Farmland Protection
|
|
Our faculty and students conducted a Cost of Community
Services study in the spring of 2000 that illustrated the
importance of farm and forest lands relative to residential
development in Oconee and Habersham Counties. Cost of Community
Services studies essentially reorganize county municipal
records to assign the cost of public services to different
classes of land use or development such as residential,
commercial, industrial, farm, forest and open lands. The
result is a ratio of expenditures-to-revenues for different
land use types. Cost of Community Services studies are especially
useful in areas undergoing development pressure. The study
found that the expenditure-to-revenue ratios for both Habersham
and Oconee Counties suggest that residential land use costs
more in services than it generates in revenue. The results
also highlight the positive contributions of farm and forest
land to the tax bases of these two counties. In late 2000
we analyzed the costs and benefits of a variety of farmland
preservation policies to a legacy farmer.
|
Cost
of Community Service Studies for Habersham and Oconee Counties,
Georgia (Note: click on "Center
Reports" and scroll down to find the study)
Protecting
Farmland in Developing Communities: A Case Study of the
Tax Implications of Conservation Easements
(large 1.7 MB PDF file)
|
| |
| Alcovy
Watershed Protection |
|
The Alliance for Quality Growth was a key participant
in the Alcovy Watershed Protection Project. The 18-month
project involved monitoring water quality and aquatic
organisms; computer modeling to predict future water quality;
and making recommendations on how to manage growth to
protect the quality and flow of the Alcovy River. The
project involved Walton, Newton, Jasper and Gwinnett Counties,
along with numerous municipalities.
|
Alcovy
Watershed Protection Project
(external site)
|
| |
|
| Habersham
Smart Growth Coalition |
|
For more than a year and a half, Alliance for Quality
Growth members have assisted the Habersham Smart Growth
Coalition (SGC) in raising awareness among the citizens
and leadership of Habersham County about the importance
of planning for future growth. The SGC is a citizen group
whose aim is to maintain natural, scenic, and historic
resources in the county while allowing for economic growth.
With help from its partners, the SGC has held numerous
educational workshops and has produced a map of future
growth recommendations for the county. In addition, the
group has present-ed specific recommendations to the Planning
Commission and the County Commission concerning land use
and growth management policy.
|
|
|
|